Automated Planning in Preoperative Software for Shoulder Arthroplasty Decreases Time and Effort in Implant Preparation - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Automated Planning in Preoperative Software for Shoulder Arthroplasty Decreases Time and Effort in Implant Preparation

  • By

  • Pierre Mahe

  • Sarah Shank

  • Arthur de Gast

  • Maud Reynier

  • February 1, 2026

Share

Objective:

To determine the impact of automated planning (AP) on the time required for preoperative planning in shoulder arthroplasty, specifically measuring planning duration and user actions.

Approach:
    Key Findings:
    • Surgeons using AP had significantly reduced planning times compared to those using manual methods (p < 0.05).
    • The number of user actions required was also lower in the AP group (p < 0.05).
    • Surgeon experience with the software influenced planning efficiency, with expert users benefiting the most.
    Interpretation:

    Automated planning tools can streamline preoperative planning, reducing time and effort for surgeons, particularly beneficial for those with less experience by providing structured guidance.

    Limitations:
    • The study focused only on glenoid-side implant planning, leaving humeral-side planning to the surgeon, which may affect overall planning efficiency.
    • Data was limited to a specific software version and may not generalize to other systems, potentially limiting the applicability of the findings.
    Conclusion:

    AP in preoperative planning for shoulder arthroplasty significantly decreases planning time and user actions, supporting its use in clinical practice.

Original Source(s)

Automated Planning in Preoperative Software for Shoulder Arthroplasty Decreases Time and Effort in Implant Preparation

  • by Pierre Mahe, Sarah Shank, Arthur de Gast, Maud Reynier

  • February 1, 2026

Related Content

CAA Use Tied to Higher Arthroplasty Risk

In a UK cohort, patients with osteoarthritis who initiated centrally acting analgesics had a higher hazard of knee or hip replacement than those who initiated SSRIs, though residual confounding by pain severity remains a key limitation.

Knee vibrations may signal cartilage damage

Machine-learning models distinguished healthy knees from those with osteoarthritis-related cartilage damage, but age and BMI performed as well as or better than the vibration-based models.

Lower BMI, Lower Joint Replacement Risk?

Researchers urge caution in interpreting joint replacement predictors, noting that surgery reflects access and decision-making as well as disease biology.