Objective:

To implement a standardised minimally invasive surgical technique for right-sided colon cancer without increasing the 90-day postoperative complication rate and to improve specific long-term oncological outcomes such as overall survival and disease-free survival.

Key Findings:

• Substantial procedural variation in minimally invasive right hemicolectomy (MIRH) exists, as documented in existing literature.
• High surgical quality is linked to better long-term survival in colorectal cancer patients, emphasizing the need for standardisation.
• Standardisation and training can reduce in-hospital mortality, highlighting the importance of structured surgical education.

Interpretation:

The study aims to bridge the gap between current surgical practices and evidence-based guidelines by implementing a standardised technique, potentially enhancing patient outcomes through improved surgical consistency.

Limitations:

• Variability in surgical practice may still exist despite standardisation; ongoing monitoring and feedback will be essential.
• Dependence on the successful implementation of training programs; strategies will be developed to ensure comprehensive training and support.

Conclusion:

The study seeks to improve surgical outcomes for right-sided colon cancer through a structured approach to standardise MIRH techniques.