Patterns of Delivery Following in Utero Transfer for Extremely Preterm Birth: A Retrospective Cohort Study From a London Tertiary Centre - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Delivery Patterns After In Utero Transfer for Extremely Preterm Birth: A Retrospective Cohort Study at a London Tertiary Centre

  • By

  • Sristi Ganguly

  • Caroline Payne

  • Caroline Nyawira

  • Sandeep Shetty

  • October 14, 2026

Share

Objective:

To describe delivery after in utero transfer (IUT) for threatened extremely preterm birth at a London tertiary centre, including delivery rates, transfer-to-delivery intervals, and maternal length of stay.

Approach:
  • Design and setting: Retrospective cohort study at St George's Hospital, a tertiary neonatal intensive care centre in the London Operational Delivery Network.
  • Participants: All women accepted for IUT from January 2021 through December 2025 who met the study's gestational-age and clinical criteria.
  • Data and analysis: Records were reviewed for 126 IUT episodes. Outcomes included delivery at the receiving centre, time to delivery, and maternal length of stay; categorical comparisons used Fisher's exact test.
Key Findings:
  • There were 126 IUT episodes; 50% of transfers occurred before 26 weeks' gestation.
  • The most frequently recorded transfer indications were preterm labour (55.5%), maternal sepsis (31.0%), and antepartum haemorrhage (21.4%).
  • After transfer, 53 of 126 women (42%) delivered at St George's Hospital.
  • No woman underwent IUT on two occasions during the study.
Interpretation:

The supplied results describe the cohort and the proportion delivering at the receiving centre. The provided context does not include the transfer-to-delivery interval or further outcome results.

Limitations:
  • The study was retrospective and conducted at a single tertiary centre.
  • Sepsis was based on clinician-documented suspicion at referral, not a standardised diagnostic definition.
  • Transfer indications were not mutually exclusive, so women with multiple indications were included in more than one indication comparison.

Original Source(s)

Related Content