Tenderness Tracks Ultrasound Findings - Summary - MDSpire

Tenderness Tracks Ultrasound Findings

  • By

  • Andrea Surnit

  • July 20, 2026

  • 5 min

Share

Objective:

To analyze the association between joint tenderness and ultrasound abnormalities in anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide-positive patients with musculoskeletal symptoms but no clinical arthritis.

Approach:
  • Study Design: Cross-sectional analysis of baseline data from 323 participants in the CCP Study, focusing on those with physical examination, pain questionnaire, and ultrasound scan completed on the same day.
  • Participants: Eligible participants were aged 18 years or older, tested positive for anti-cyclic citrullinated peptide antibodies, and had new nonspecific musculoskeletal complaints without clinical arthritis or a history of inflammatory arthritis.
  • Assessment Methods: Joint tenderness assessed by a rheumatologist; ultrasound evaluated gray-scale synovitis, power Doppler activity, tenosynovitis, and erosions.
  • Statistical Analysis: Joint-level associations were evaluated using generalized estimating equation logistic models, adjusting for age and sex.
Key Findings:
  • Joint tenderness was more consistently associated with ultrasound abnormalities than patient-reported joint pain.
  • Significant associations were found between tenderness and gray-scale abnormalities, power Doppler activity, tenosynovitis, and erosions.
  • Absence of tenderness had high negative predictive values for power Doppler activity, tenosynovitis, and erosions.
  • Positive predictive values for tenderness indicating ultrasound abnormalities were generally limited.
Interpretation:

The findings suggest that joint tenderness may be a more reliable indicator of ultrasound abnormalities than patient-reported pain, but the study does not establish a clinical scanning strategy.

Limitations:
  • Adjustment was made only for age and sex.
  • Regional pain reporting rather than joint-specific.
  • Dichotomization of ultrasound scores.
  • Protocol and equipment changes during recruitment.
  • Low event counts at some joints.
  • Absence of formal reliability testing.
Conclusion:

The study highlights the need for further research to evaluate the role of physical examination findings in guiding ultrasound assessments in patients at risk for rheumatoid arthritis.

Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content