Effectiveness and safety of switching biologics after secukinumab treatment failure in moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a retrospective cohort study - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Evaluating the Safety and Efficacy of Switching to Alternative Biologics Following Secukinumab Treatment Failure in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis: A Retrospective Cohort Analysis

  • By

  • Zhongyu Zhang

  • Bin Zhang

  • Yating Wen

  • Qian Hu

  • Wenjun Jiang

  • Jia Zhuo

  • Guangying Luo

  • Yuyi Wang

  • July 6, 2026

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the effectiveness and safety of switching to ixekizumab, guselkumab, or ustekinumab in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis who failed secukinumab.

Approach:
  • Study Design: Retrospective cohort study analyzing 59 patients who switched from secukinumab to ixekizumab, guselkumab, or ustekinumab.
  • Endpoints: Primary endpoints included PASI 75, PASI 90, and PASI 100 response rates at weeks 12, 24, and 52.
  • Data Handling: Missing data were managed using non-responder imputation (NRI).
Key Findings:
  • Ixekizumab had a higher PASI 75 response rate at week 12 compared to guselkumab and ustekinumab (66.7% vs. 28.1% vs. 16.7%, P = 0.010).
  • In the secondary failure subgroup, ixekizumab showed a numerical advantage in PASI 75 response at all time points but did not reach statistical significance.
  • Adverse event rates were 28.6% for ixekizumab, 12.5% for guselkumab, and 33.3% for ustekinumab, with no significant differences between groups (P = 0.281).
Interpretation:

Limitations:
  • Small sample size may limit the generalizability of findings.
  • Limited statistical power for subgroup analyses due to sample size.
Conclusion:

Original Source(s)

Related Content