Myocardial function recovery in peripartum cardiomyopathy: the role of global longitudinal strain and myocardial work - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Recovery of Myocardial Function in Peripartum Cardiomyopathy: Insights from Global Longitudinal Strain and Myocardial Work Analysis

  • By

  • Federica Ilardi

  • Federica Carusone

  • Dario D’Alconzo

  • Rachele Manzo

  • Alessia Palmentieri

  • Ciro Battaglia

  • Dalila Nappa

  • Giuseppe Giugliano

  • Raffaella Lombardi

  • Santo Dellegrottaglie

  • Viviana Narciso

  • Roberta Paolillo

  • Luca Bardi

  • Francesco S. Loffredo

  • Daniele Masarone

  • Enrica Pezzullo

  • Francesca Lanni

  • Donato Gerardi

  • Eugenio Stabile

  • Angelicarosa Cascone

  • Nouha Azaza

  • Giovanni Peretto

  • Giuseppe Bifulco

  • Attilio Di Spiezio Sardo

  • Gabriele Saccone

  • Alaide Chieffo

  • Cinzia Perrino

  • Giovanni Esposito

  • August 26, 2026

Share

Objective:

To investigate whether incomplete myocardial recovery in peripartum cardiomyopathy (PPCM) is associated with subtle abnormalities in myocardial performance using global longitudinal strain (GLS) and myocardial work (MW) indices.

Approach:
  • Study Design: Retrospective analysis of 22 women with PPCM, assessed at least 6 months post-acute phase, registered in the Italian Multicentre Observational PPCM Registry.
  • Echocardiographic Assessment: Evaluation of myocardial mechanics included GLS, global work index, global constructive work, global wasted work, and GWE.
  • Group Classification: Participants were categorized based on LVEF into Group A (<50%) and Group B (≥50%), with a control group of 21 age-matched healthy women.
Key Findings:
  • LV recovery occurred in 16 women (72.7%).
  • Groups A and B had greater LV diameters and volumes compared to controls (p < 0.001).
  • Group A exhibited significantly poorer GLS and MW parameters (p < 0.001 for all).
  • Group B had lower GLS (18.0 ± 3.1% vs. 21.8 ± 1.7%, p < 0.001) and GWE (92.6 ± 6.0 vs. 95.9 ± 2.0%, p = 0.023) than controls.
Interpretation:

GLS and MW indices may detect myocardial impairment not captured by conventional systolic-function measures, indicating residual subclinical dysfunction in PPCM patients.

Limitations:
  • Small sample size of 22 women.
  • Retrospective nature may introduce bias.
Conclusion:

GLS and MW indices provide a more sensitive assessment of myocardial performance in PPCM, highlighting persistent abnormalities even after LVEF normalization.

Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content