To evaluate the accuracy and reproducibility of three centric relation recording techniques: bimanual manipulation (BM), chin-point guidance (CPG), and anterior deprogrammer (ADP) using the OccluSense digital occlusal analyzer.
Key Findings:
BM and CPG showed substantial initial agreement with the ADP reference, but reproducibility declined in repeated measurements, highlighting the need for careful technique application.
ADP exhibited superior consistency, reinforcing its role as the gold standard.
Interpretation:
While ADP is the most reliable CR recording method, BM and CPG can be effective alternatives when performed by skilled clinicians.
Limitations:
Operator dependency for manual techniques may introduce variability in results.
The limited sample size of 27 participants may affect the generalizability of the findings.
Conclusion:
Digital tools like the OccluSense enhance objectivity in CR recording but do not replace the need for clinical expertise, emphasizing the importance of skilled clinicians in the application of these techniques.
