CLEAR report 1: a scoping review and meta-analysis for definitions, imaging metrics, and functional correlates of photoreceptor integrity in AMD - Summary - MDSpire

CLEAR report 1: a scoping review and meta-analysis for definitions, imaging metrics, and functional correlates of photoreceptor integrity in AMD

  • By

  • Kimberly L. Spooner

  • Anjali Gaston

  • Anushka Irodi

  • Alicia Lim

  • Omer Trivizki

  • Livia Faes

  • Sobha Sivaprasad

  • Dun Jack Fu

  • July 6, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To map how axial photoreceptor biomarkers are operationalized, segmented, validated, and related to functional and multimodal endpoints in age-related macular degeneration (AMD).

Approach:
  • Study Selection: MEDLINE, Embase, and Scopus were searched from January 2015 to December 2025 following PRISMA-ScR guidelines for studies reporting OCT-based photoreceptor biomarkers in AMD populations.
  • Data Extraction: Data captured included boundary definitions, imaging platforms, segmentation approaches, analytic domains, ROI strategies, reliability statistics, structure–function correlations, and OCT–FAF agreement.
Key Findings:
  • Ninety-four studies met inclusion criteria, showing variability in boundary definitions, measurement strategies, and spatial sampling.
  • High reliability for EZ and ONL metrics was observed when segmentation boundaries were clearly defined (ICC > 0.90).
  • Moderate-to-strong correlations were found between photoreceptor loss and microperimetry sensitivity (r = 0.50–0.80) and best-corrected visual acuity (r = 0.40–0.70).
  • OCT–FAF agreement for geographic atrophy detection was high (κ > 0.80), though early atrophic features showed greater definitional variability.
Interpretation:

OCT-derived photoreceptor biomarkers demonstrate high analytical reliability and clinically meaningful structure–function associations when reporting conventions are consistently applied.

Limitations:
  • Substantial construct heterogeneity complicates cross-study comparability and endpoint interpretation.
  • Inconsistent documentation of phenotypic stratification and topographic reporting.
Conclusion:

Adoption of consensus boundary definitions, minimum reporting standards, and harmonized validation frameworks is necessary for reproducibility and regulatory evaluation.

Original Source(s)

Related Content