Biportal endoscopic laminectomy vs. open-door laminoplasty for 2–3 levels of cervical myelopathy: a prospective observational cohort study - Summary - MDSpire

Biportal endoscopic laminectomy vs. open-door laminoplasty for 2–3 levels of cervical myelopathy: a prospective observational cohort study

  • By

  • Dongfang Yang

  • Mei Li

  • Haibin Zhang

  • Mengchen Yin

  • Mingyang Zhu

  • Weibing Xu

  • July 2, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To compare biportal endoscopic laminectomy (BE-L) with open-door laminoplasty (OD-L) for multilevel cervical myelopathy (CM) focusing on neurological recovery, perioperative burden, and sagittal alignment.

Approach:
  • Study Design: A prospective observational study enrolling 128 patients with 2–3 level CM from November 2022 to May 2024, using propensity score matching to create 50 matched pairs.
Key Findings:
  • BE-L resulted in shorter operative time, lower perioperative hemoglobin drop, and shorter hospital stay compared to OD-L.
  • At 3 months, mJOA scores favored BE-L, but the difference was not clinically significant at 6 or 12 months.
  • Early NDI and VASneck scores favored BE-L, converging by 12 months.
  • No significant differences in C2–C7 Cobb angle were observed at any time point.
  • Four transient neurological deficits occurred in the BE-L group during the initial learning curve.
Interpretation:

BE-L achieves 12-month neurological and functional outcomes comparable to those of OD-L, with advantages in early postoperative recovery and shorter hospitalization.

Limitations:
  • Thestudyisobservationalandnotrandomized,whichmaylimitthestrengthoftheconclusions.Additionally,thesamplesizemaylimitthegeneralizabilityoffindings.
Conclusion:

BE-L represents a viable minimally invasive alternative for carefully selected patients with 2–3 level CM.

Original Source(s)

Related Content