Biportal endoscopic laminectomy vs. open-door laminoplasty for 2–3 levels of cervical myelopathy: a prospective observational cohort study - Summary - MDSpire
Advertisement
Biportal endoscopic laminectomy vs. open-door laminoplasty for 2–3 levels of cervical myelopathy: a prospective observational cohort study
To compare biportal endoscopic laminectomy (BE-L) with open-door laminoplasty (OD-L) for multilevel cervical myelopathy (CM) focusing on neurological recovery, perioperative burden, and sagittal alignment.
Approach:
Study Design: A prospective observational study enrolling 128 patients with 2–3 level CM from November 2022 to May 2024, using propensity score matching to create 50 matched pairs.
Key Findings:
BE-L resulted in shorter operative time, lower perioperative hemoglobin drop, and shorter hospital stay compared to OD-L.
At 3 months, mJOA scores favored BE-L, but the difference was not clinically significant at 6 or 12 months.
Early NDI and VASneck scores favored BE-L, converging by 12 months.
No significant differences in C2–C7 Cobb angle were observed at any time point.
Four transient neurological deficits occurred in the BE-L group during the initial learning curve.
Interpretation:
BE-L achieves 12-month neurological and functional outcomes comparable to those of OD-L, with advantages in early postoperative recovery and shorter hospitalization.