Image-guided injections for facet joint pain: evidence-based Delphi conjoined consensus paper from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology and European Society of Neuroradiology - Summary - MDSpire

Image-guided injections for facet joint pain: evidence-based Delphi conjoined consensus paper from the European Society of Musculoskeletal Radiology and European Society of Neuroradiology

  • By

  • Luca Maria Sconfienza

  • Danoob Dalili

  • Miraude Adriaensen

  • Domenico Albano

  • Georgina Allen

  • Maria Pilar Aparisi Gomez

  • Giacomo Aringhieri

  • Francesco Arrigoni

  • Alberto Bazzocchi

  • Miguel Oliveira Castro

  • Roberto Luigi Cazzato

  • Miriam De Dea

  • Aldo Eros De Vivo

  • Elena Drakonaki

  • Fernando Facal de Castro

  • Dimitrios Filippiadis

  • Jan Fritz

  • Inês Gil

  • Salvatore Gitto

  • Hannes Gruber

  • Harun Gupta

  • Amanda Isaac

  • Andrea S. Klauser

  • Thomas Le Corroller

  • Alexander Loizides

  • Salvatore Marsico

  • Giovanni Mauri

  • Eugene McNally

  • Kalliopi Melaki

  • Carmelo Messina

  • Rebeca Mirón Mombiela

  • Cyprian Olchowy

  • Davide Orlandi

  • Ricardo Moutinho

  • Riccardo Picasso

  • Mahesh Prakash

  • Nicolas Theumann

  • Violeta Vasilevska Nikodinovska

  • Evangelia E. Vassalou

  • Jelena Vucetic

  • David Wilson

  • Federico Zaottini

  • Marcello Zappia

  • Chiara Zini

  • Žiga Snoj

  • May 8, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To assess the evidence on image-guided injections for treating facet joint pain and to develop evidence-based clinical indications that can guide clinical practice.

Key Findings:
  • US-guided injections yield better outcomes than blind injections for lumbar facet joint pain, as evidenced by improved clinical outcomes in a randomized controlled trial.
  • Medial branch block with local anesthetic and corticosteroid shows similar outcomes to local anesthetic only, indicating effective pain management strategies.
  • US-guided injections of methylene blue and lidocaine are safe and effective for lumbar facet joint pain, with significant benefits observed at 3 and 6 months.
  • US-guided cervical medial branch blocks are quicker and require fewer needle passes than fluoroscopy-guided, enhancing procedural efficiency.
  • No clinical outcome differences were found between US-guided, fluoroscopy-guided, and CT-guided cervical injections, suggesting comparable efficacy across methods.
  • The lateral US-guided approach is more accurate than the posterior approach for cervical facet joint injections, improving procedural precision.
  • No differences in outcomes between thoracic facet joint injections and medial branch blocks under fluoroscopy guidance, indicating consistent effectiveness.
  • No significant time duration differences were observed among US-guided, fluoroscopy-guided, and CT-guided lumbar procedures, suggesting similar procedural times.
Interpretation:

Image-guided injections, particularly using ultrasound, provide effective and safer options for managing facet joint pain, with evidence supporting their use over traditional methods, which may influence treatment protocols.

Limitations:
  • The long-term outcomes of US-guided injections remain unknown, highlighting a gap in the current evidence base.
  • Variability in procedure time definitions and measurements across studies may affect comparisons, suggesting a need for standardized reporting.
Conclusion:

The consensus paper provides a comprehensive overview of the efficacy and safety of image-guided injections for facet joint pain, emphasizing the advantages of ultrasound guidance and its potential impact on clinical practice.

Original Source(s)

Related Content