Determinants of metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease and liver fibrosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study - Summary - MDSpire

Determinants of metabolic dysfunction associated steatotic liver disease and liver fibrosis in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus: a cross-sectional study

  • By

  • Soumaya Mrabet

  • Ghada Saad

  • Asma Ben cheikh

  • Mohamed Abu Awad

  • Imen Halloul

  • Raida Harbi

  • Meryam Eloillaf

  • Imen Akkari

  • Yosra Hasni

  • Elhem Ben Jazia

  • July 17, 2026

Share

Objective:

To determine the prevalence of metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) and advanced liver fibrosis, as well as the associated factors in patients with type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2D).

Approach:
  • Study Design: Cross-sectional study including 149 patients with T2D, conducted over 6 months in Endocrinology-Diabetology and Hepato-Gastroenterology departments.
  • Screening Method: Screening for steatosis and liver fibrosis was performed using FibroScan.
Key Findings:
  • 69.1% of participants met the criteria for MASLD [95% CI (61.7–76.5)].
  • Advanced fibrosis could not be ruled out in 17.4% of patients [95% CI (11.7-24.5)], with 4% at high risk (≥12 kPa).
  • High Body Mass Index was an independent predictor of MASLD (aOR = 1.25; 95% CI (1.13–1.38); p < 0.001).
  • Total cholesterol was an independent predictor of MASLD (aOR = 1.69; 95% CI (1.15–2.48); p = 0.007).
  • Higher platelet distribution width (PDW) was associated with nearly a threefold increase in the odds of advanced fibrosis (aOR = 2.78; 95% CI: 1.08–7.21; p = 0.035).
  • Increasing GGT levels were significantly associated with advanced fibrosis (aOR = 1.12; 95% CI: 1.03–1.21; p = 0.006).
Interpretation:

The study found a significant prevalence of MASLD in patients with T2D and identified key risk factors for advanced liver fibrosis.

Limitations:
  • The study was limited to a single center and may not be generalizable.
  • Exclusion of patients with other liver diseases may affect the findings.
Conclusion:

The study emphasizes the importance of identifying at-risk patients for effective management of liver disease.

Original Source(s)

Related Content