Evaluating negative-pressure wound therapy after abdominoperineal resection: a systematic review of efficacy and technical variability - Summary - MDSpire

Evaluating negative-pressure wound therapy after abdominoperineal resection: a systematic review of efficacy and technical variability

  • By

  • A. Litchinko

  • F. Ris

  • B. Noiret

  • M. Adamina

  • Q. Denost

  • September 23, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To provide a comprehensive assessment of the incidence, types, and management of wound complications following abdominoperineal resection (APR), with a specific focus on the role of prophylactic negative-pressure wound therapy (pNPWT) in preventing these complications.

Key Findings:
  • Perineal wound complications occur in up to 50% of patients undergoing APR, with studies indicating varying rates based on specific patient factors.
  • Factors contributing to high complication rates include preoperative radiotherapy, extensive resections, and comorbidities such as diabetes and obesity.
  • pNPWT has shown promise in reducing surgical site infections (SSIs) and wound dehiscence in various surgical fields, though evidence specific to APR is limited.
  • Early studies indicate pNPWT may improve wound healing times in APR, but pooled evidence remains scarce and further investigation is warranted.
  • Inconsistent results across studies regarding the efficacy of pNPWT, with some reporting increased SSI rates, highlight the need for more rigorous research.
Interpretation:

While pNPWT may offer benefits in managing perineal wounds post-APR, further research is needed to establish its long-term efficacy, cost-effectiveness, and optimal application strategies, particularly in diverse patient populations.

Limitations:
  • Scarcity of pooled evidence on the efficacy of pNPWT limits generalizability.
  • Inconsistent results across literature regarding SSI rates necessitate caution in interpretation.
  • The lack of established protocols for integrating pNPWT into postoperative care poses challenges for standardization and implementation.
Conclusion:

Further research is essential to determine the most effective implementation strategies for pNPWT in APR patients and to quantify its impact on patient outcomes.

Original Source(s)

Related Content