Acute myelopathy following chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T cell therapy: an unusual diagnostic challenge - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Acute Myelopathy After CAR T-Cell Therapy: A Rare Diagnostic Dilemma

  • By

  • Antoine Bois

  • Corentin Provost

  • Justine Decroocq

  • Sarah Benghanem

  • October 8, 2026

Share

Objective:

The article examines the objective, findings, and clinical context described in Acute Myelopathy After CAR T-Cell Therapy: A Rare Diagnostic Dilemma.

Approach:
  • Infection assessment: In profoundly immunocompromised patients, infectious myelitis—particularly viral causes—should be excluded. In this case, negative cerebrospinal fluid cultures and multiplex PCR made infection unlikely.
  • Imaging and diagnosis: MRI showed a longitudinally extensive, non-enhancing spinal cord lesion. With concurrent brain lesions suggestive of ICANS and infectious causes excluded, the authors considered ICANS-associated myelopathy the most likely diagnosis.
  • Treatment and uncertainty: Because severe encephalopathy limited neurological examination, the timing of spinal cord involvement was difficult to establish. The patient was treated for grade IV ICANS with high-dose corticosteroids and anakinra.
Key Findings:
  • Acute extensive myelopathy may occur after CAR T-cell therapy and may represent spinal cord involvement in ICANS.
  • A non-enhancing longitudinal spinal cord lesion is nonspecific; similar imaging findings have been described in limited reports of ICANS-associated myelopathy.
  • The authors report no definitive evidence supporting a specific treatment for ICANS-associated myelopathy, including immunoglobulins or plasmapheresis.
Interpretation:

The authors considered ICANS-associated myelopathy the most likely explanation in this case after infectious causes were rendered unlikely.

Limitations:
  • The timing of spinal cord involvement was difficult to determine because severe encephalopathy prevented a comprehensive neurological examination.
  • Evidence on diagnosis, treatment, and prognosis is limited; the authors state that larger series are needed.
Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content