Laryngoscope-Guided plasma radiofrequency ablation combined with incision/drainage for neonatal congenital pyriform Sinus Fistula with abscess: safety and minimally invasive approach - Summary - MDSpire

Laryngoscope-Guided plasma radiofrequency ablation combined with incision/drainage for neonatal congenital pyriform Sinus Fistula with abscess: safety and minimally invasive approach

  • By

  • Dongjihui Zhao

  • Yun Li

  • Binya Hu

  • Min Huang

  • Sijun Zhao

  • Guangliang Liu

  • June 29, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the clinical safety, efficacy, and recurrence management of a combined surgical approach—neck abscess incision and drainage coupled with low-temperature plasma radiofrequency ablation under laryngoscope-guided suspension laryngoscopy—for neonatal congenital pyriform sinus fistula (CPSF) at the abscess stage.

Approach:
  • Study Design: Retrospective analysis of 21 neonatal abscess-stage CPSF patients at Hunan Children’s Hospital from January 2020 to January 2025.
  • Patient Groups: Patients were divided into a simple drainage group (n = 7) and a combined surgery group (n = 14) based on family request.
  • Metrics Compared: Operative time, blood loss, 24-hour NIPS pain score, vocal cord mobility, NFSS-8 swallowing score, hospital stay, and recurrence rate.
Key Findings:
  • No significant differences in baseline variables between groups (P > 0.05).
  • Combined group had longer operating time (P < 0.001) but equal blood loss (P = 0.068) and pain levels (P = 0.624).
  • Lower NFSS-8 swallowing score in combined group (11.87 ± 2.94 vs. 15.29 ± 4.01, P = 0.019).
  • Higher normal vocal cord movement in combined group (92.86% vs. 57.14%, P = 0.043).
  • Lower 12-month recurrence rate in combined group (7.14% vs. 100%, P = 0.002).
Interpretation:

Combining neck abscess incision and drainage with Plasma Radiofrequency Ablation under Laryngoscope-guided is a safe and efficient treatment for CPSF in neonates with abscess.

Limitations:
  • Non-randomized, retrospective cohort study design.
  • Selection bias due to parental preference for treatment group allocation.
  • Causal inferences regarding comparative efficacy cannot be drawn.
Conclusion:

This minimally invasive approach warrants further investigation in larger prospective, randomized studies.

Original Source(s)

Related Content