Investigation of cerebral cortical morphological similarity and network topological abnormalities in hepatic encephalopathy utilizing a morphometric inverse divergence network framework - Summary - MDSpire

Investigation of cerebral cortical morphological similarity and network topological abnormalities in hepatic encephalopathy utilizing a morphometric inverse divergence network framework

  • By

  • Chengkun Hong

  • Taipeng Zeng

  • Xiaoyang Wang

  • Li Chen

  • Minghui Mao

  • Hao Huang

  • Jianfeng Chu

  • Liyuan Fu

  • July 6, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To explore cerebral cortical morphological similarity and topological abnormalities in hepatic encephalopathy (HE) by integrating the Morphometric Inverse Divergence (MIND) network with graph theory.

Approach:
  • Participants: 31 HE patients, 30 cirrhotic non-HE (NHE) patients, and 30 healthy controls (HC) underwent 3.0T MRI scanning.
  • Image Processing: FreeSurfer was utilized for preprocessing images, extracting five cortical morphological features based on the Schaefer-400 atlas.
  • Network Construction: MIND networks were constructed using symmetric Kullback–Leibler divergence, and graph theory was applied to analyze topological properties.
  • Statistical Analysis: Intergroup differences were analyzed using a general linear model (GLM).
Key Findings:
  • HE patients showed significantly elevated mean MIND values across multiple functional subnetworks compared to HCs, including the visual (VIS; t = 3.629, p = 0.004), default mode (DMN; t = 3.115, p = 0.009), limbic (LMB; t = 2.969, p = 0.009), frontoparietal (FPN; t = 2.917, p = 0.009), and ventral attention (VAN; t = 2.212, p = 0.043).
  • Graph theoretical analysis indicated increased global efficiency (Eglob; t = 2.681, p = 0.0100) and local efficiency (Eloc; t = 2.683, p = 0.010).
  • NHE patients exhibited mild DMN connectivity enhancement but no significant differences in MIND and nodal metrics (all p > 0.05).
Interpretation:

HE is associated with abnormal whole-brain cortical morphological covariance networks characterized by enhanced connectivity and efficiency.

Limitations:
  • The study's sample size may limit the generalizability of the findings.
  • Potential confounding factors related to patient characteristics and imaging protocols were not fully addressed.
Conclusion:

MIND network indices may serve as potential imaging biomarkers for HE diagnosis and monitoring, addressing limitations of traditional structural covariance network research.

Original Source(s)

Related Content