Demographics and Geographic Accessibility of Invasive Fungal Infection Clinical Trial Sites - Summary - MDSpire

Demographics and Geographic Accessibility of Invasive Fungal Infection Clinical Trial Sites

  • By

  • Lucy X. Li

  • Jiashu Xue

  • Olivia S. Kates

  • Robin K. Avery

  • Sean X. Zhang

  • John W. Baddley

  • Christine M. Durand

  • Nitipong Permpalung

  • June 11, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To investigate the distribution of systemic antifungal trials and the demographics of local populations affected by invasive fungal infections (IFIs) in the US.

Approach:
    Key Findings:
    • Twenty-seven antifungal clinical trials identified across 249 unique sites, with a median enrollment of 88 participants per trial.
    • Trial sites predominantly located in urban areas; 99.3% of populations around treatment sites and 98.6% around prophylaxis sites resided in metropolitan areas.
    • Racial minority groups were more represented in immediate and extended catchments of prophylaxis sites compared to the US population (SMD ZCTA, 0.61; 30 miles, 0.28).
    • A higher proportion of residents with incomes below 150% of the federal poverty level lived in immediate catchment areas compared to the overall US population (SMD treatment, 0.17; prophylaxis, 0.35).
    • Significant vehicle availability issues were noted, with 46.8% of treatment and 66.9% of prophylaxis catchment residents having fewer vehicles than household members.
    Interpretation:

    The concentration of IFI trial sites in metropolitan areas may lead to underrepresentation of diverse populations affected by invasive fungal infections, particularly in rural regions with significant disease burden.

    Limitations:
    • Lack of participant-level data prevented analysis of trial demographics and indirect costs, limiting the understanding of how these factors influence trial participation.
    • Descriptive approach limits the ability to draw causal conclusions.
    Conclusion:

    The findings highlight the need for strategies to ensure equitable participation and access in clinical trials, capturing disease diversity to advance antifungal drug development, particularly in underserved rural populations.

Original Source(s)

Related Content