PFO closure in ischemic stroke: insights from a single-center real-world cohort - Summary - MDSpire

PFO closure in ischemic stroke: insights from a single-center real-world cohort

  • By

  • Felix Müller

  • Arda Civelek

  • Luis Weitbrecht

  • Lukas Badura

  • Kai Helge Schmidt

  • Florian Schlotter

  • Philipp Lurz

  • Stavros V. Konstantinides

  • Karsten Keller

  • Klaus Gröschel

  • Marianne Hahn

  • Timo Uphaus

  • May 8, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To outline the real-world management of individuals with PFO who have experienced ischemic stroke or TIA and to investigate the AS5F score for evaluating AF risk, emphasizing its potential role in clinical decision-making.

Key Findings:
  • 62 out of 188 individuals received PFO closure, showing younger age and fewer cardiovascular risk factors, with statistical significance noted.
  • Closure cohort had a higher RoPE score (6.0 ± 1.7 vs. 4.1 ± 1.5; p < 0.001), indicating a stronger association with PFO-related stroke.
  • AS5F score was lower in closure individuals but higher in those with AF (p < 0.001), highlighting the need for careful risk assessment.
  • In patients aged ≥60 years, higher AS5F scores correlated with AF (cut-off 3.8; p = 0.026), suggesting age-related risk factors.
  • More than half of individuals with recurrent events were categorized as cryptogenic, indicating potential gaps in current diagnostic practices.
Interpretation:

The study highlights practical decision-making in PFO-related stroke management and suggests that while RoPE and PASCAL scores are important, a systematic AF risk evaluation may provide additional benefits, particularly for older patients, thereby enhancing clinical outcomes.

Limitations:
  • Moderate sample size, especially among senior patients, which may limit the generalizability of findings.
  • Findings should be viewed as exploratory and hypothesis-generating, necessitating further research to validate results.
Conclusion:

The significance of PFO in recurrent strokes may be undervalued, indicating a need for comprehensive risk assessment in clinical practice, particularly in light of the study's findings on AF risk and cryptogenic strokes.

Original Source(s)

Related Content