Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder among civilians in Indian-administered Kashmir: a systematic review - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Prevalence and Risk Factors of Post-Traumatic Stress Disorder in Civilian Populations of Indian-Administered Kashmir: A Systematic Review

  • By

  • Tamkeen Sakeena

  • Aneeza Pervez

  • Cecilie Lolansen

  • September 15, 2026

Share

Objective:

To systematically synthesize evidence concerning PTSD prevalence, risk factors, and correlates among civilians in Indian-administered Kashmir exposed to prolonged armed conflict.

Approach:
  • Systematic Review: A systematic review was conducted following PRISMA guidelines, examining empirical studies published through 2025. Sixteen quantitative investigations were included for narrative synthesis.
Key Findings:
  • PTSD prevalence estimates in community-based adults ranged from 15.9% to 24.5%.
  • Higher prevalence rates were observed in specific groups: 49.8% among college students and 40% among children meeting PCL-C criteria.
  • Higher PTSD prevalence was found in women, socioeconomically disadvantaged populations, orphans, and individuals with direct conflict-related injuries.
  • Dose-response associations were noted between cumulative trauma exposure and PTSD.
  • PTSD symptoms were reported years after exposure and often co-occurred with depression, anxiety, and substance misuse.
  • The review highlights variability in PTSD prevalence estimates attributable to methodological differences in studies.
Interpretation:

The review highlights significant PTSD prevalence among civilians in Kashmir, influenced by methodological differences in studies.

Limitations:
  • Substantial variation in study quality.
  • Dependence on cross-sectional research.
Conclusion:

The findings indicate a demand for psychiatric care in Kashmir that exceeds available capacity, suggesting the need for low-resource intervention options. More consistent assessment methods and study designs, together with additional longitudinal research, are required to reinforce psychiatric epidemiological evidence from armed conflict settings.

Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content