Survival outcomes with Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patient according to baseline tumor characteristics - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Survival Outcomes After Lutetium-177-PSMA-617 for Metastatic Castration-Resistant Prostate Cancer by Baseline Tumor Features

  • By

  • Mike Wenzel

  • Quynh Chi Le

  • Carolin Siech

  • Benedikt Hoeh

  • Konrad Klimek

  • Christian Happel

  • Fred Saad

  • Felix Preisser

  • Derya Tilki

  • Markus Graefen

  • Thomas Steuber

  • Tobias Maurer

  • Maximilian C. Kriegmair

  • Pierre I. Karakiewicz

  • Felix K. H. Chun

  • Daniel Groener

  • Philipp Mandel

  • October 20, 2026

Share

Objective:

To assess progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after Lu-177-PSMA treatment according to baseline metastatic timing, Gleason score, and M-stage in patients with mCRPC.

Approach:
  • Design and population: Retrospective analysis of 344 patients in the FRAMCAP database treated with Lu-177-PSMA in mCRPC treatment lines 1–7; 198 had synchronous and 146 metachronous metastases.
  • Treatment and outcomes: Patients received PSMA-617 or PSMA-I&T every 4–6 weeks. PFS was measured from treatment initiation to new systemic therapy or death; OS was measured to death from any cause.
  • Analysis: Kaplan–Meier and Cox regression analyses examined outcomes by metastatic timing, Gleason score (6–7 vs 8–10), and M-stage (M1a, M1b, M1c).
Key Findings:
  • Median PFS was 12.1 months for synchronous and 13.0 months for metachronous disease; the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.53).
  • Median PFS was 12.9 months for Gleason score 6–7 and 11.8 months for score 8–10; the difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.35).
  • Median PFS by M-stage was 11.9 months for M1a, 9.5 months for M1b, and 8.2 months for M1c; the overall difference was not statistically significant (p = 0.08).
Interpretation:

In the reported PFS analyses, no statistically significant differences were observed by metastatic timing, Gleason score, or M-stage.

Limitations:
  • The study was retrospective and based on a single-center database.
  • The provided article context ends during the univariable Cox regression results; OS findings and the remaining regression results are not available.
Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content