Effect of prior therapy on the clinical activity of imetelstat in patients with transfusion-dependent, ESA-relapsed or -refractory/-ineligible LR-MDS - Summary - MDSpire

Effect of prior therapy on the clinical activity of imetelstat in patients with transfusion-dependent, ESA-relapsed or -refractory/-ineligible LR-MDS

  • By

  • Rami S. Komrokji

  • Valeria Santini

  • Amer M. Zeidan

  • Mikkael A. Sekeres

  • Pierre Fenaux

  • Azra Raza

  • Moshe Mittelman

  • Sylvain Thépot

  • Rena Buckstein

  • Ulrich Germing

  • Yazan F. Madanat

  • María Díez-Campelo

  • David Valcárcel

  • Anna Jonášová

  • Souria Dougherty

  • Sheetal Shah

  • Qi Xia

  • Libo Sun

  • Shyamala Navada

  • Faye Feller

  • Michael R. Savona

  • Uwe Platzbecker

  • December 31, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To investigate the effects of prior therapies on the clinical activity of imetelstat in patients with transfusion-dependent, ESA-relapsed or -refractory/-ineligible lower-risk myelodysplastic syndromes (LR-MDS), highlighting the significance of these findings in improving treatment strategies.

Key Findings:
  • Median duration of ≥8-week RBC transfusion independence (TI) for the pooled population was 55 weeks (95% CI: 42–70).
  • 36% of ESA-ineligible patients achieved ≥8-week TI, with higher rates in treatment-naive patients (54%).
  • Imetelstat showed clinically meaningful activity after prior ESA, luspatercept, and lenalidomide, but limited activity after prior HMAs.
Interpretation:

Imetelstat demonstrates significant clinical activity in patients with LR-MDS, particularly in those who have not previously received ESA therapy, suggesting its potential as a valuable treatment option in this population and its implications for clinical practice.

Limitations:
  • The analysis is post hoc and may be subject to biases, particularly in patient selection.
  • Overall survival data were not mature at the time of analysis.
Conclusion:

Imetelstat shows promise in treating transfusion-dependent LR-MDS, especially in patients with limited prior therapy exposure, underscoring the need for optimal sequencing of therapies to enhance patient outcomes.

Original Source(s)

Related Content