Impact of RAS mutation status on early progression in patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases undergoing conversion therapy: a retrospective analysis - Summary - MDSpire

Impact of RAS mutation status on early progression in patients with initially unresectable colorectal liver metastases undergoing conversion therapy: a retrospective analysis

  • By

  • Rong Yang

  • Weili Zhang

  • Jin Lan

  • Weihao Li

  • Zhigang Hong

  • Jun Chi

  • Jianhong Peng

  • Cong Li

  • Xiaojun Wu

  • July 1, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the prognostic impact of RAS mutation status in patients with initially unresectable colorectal cancer liver metastases (IU-CRLM) undergoing conversion therapy.

Approach:
  • Study Design: A retrospective cohort study including 194 patients with IU-CRLM treated at Sun Yat-sen University Cancer Center from December 2012 to January 2020.
  • Patient Selection: Inclusion criteria included histologically confirmed colorectal adenocarcinoma with proficient mismatch repair, confirmed liver metastasis, and availability of RAS mutation status.
  • Outcome Measures: Early progression/recurrence was defined as disease progression after failed conversion, recurrence after successful conversion, or death within six months.
Key Findings:
  • 44.8% of patients achieved successful conversion.
  • 26.3% of patients harbored RAS mutations.
  • RAS-mutant patients had a higher early progression/recurrence rate (41.2% vs. 19.6%, P = 0.004).
  • In failed conversion cases, RAS mutation was associated with a higher early progression rate (36.7% vs. 13.0%, P = 0.012).
  • In successfully converted patients, early recurrence rates did not differ significantly by RAS status (47.6% vs. 27.3%, P = 0.142).
Interpretation:

RAS mutation is associated with a higher risk of early progression/recurrence in patients with IU-CRLM undergoing conversion therapy, particularly among those who fail to achieve successful conversion.

Limitations:
  • Retrospective design may introduce selection bias.
  • Single-center study limits generalizability.
  • Limited follow-up duration may affect long-term outcome assessment.
Conclusion:

These findings may support individualized surveillance and treatment strategies for RAS-mutant IU-CRLM.

Original Source(s)

Related Content