Efficacy of acupuncture-based traditional Chinese medicine therapies for chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis - Summary - MDSpire

Efficacy of acupuncture-based traditional Chinese medicine therapies for chronic fatigue syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • By

  • Yanbing Li

  • Gaozhe Liang

  • Tingting Xiao

  • Lei Xu

  • June 24, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To systematically review the available evidence on acupuncture-related therapies for chronic fatigue syndrome (CFS).

Approach:
  • Literature Search: Systematic search of PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library for RCTs on acupuncture-related therapies for CFS.
  • Data Extraction: Two researchers independently performed literature screening, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment.
  • Quality Assessment: Methodological quality evaluated using the Cochrane RoB 2 tool for RCTs.
  • Meta-Analysis: Conducted using R software; outcomes expressed as standardized mean difference (SMD) and risk ratio (RR).
Key Findings:
  • 8 RCTs involving 715 patients were included.
  • Acupuncture-related therapies showed significant improvement in overall fatigue (SMD = -1.31, 95% CI: -2.16 to -0.47, p = 0.002).
  • Significant improvements in physical fatigue (SMD = -0.52, 95% CI: -0.88 to -0.16, p = 0.0048) and mental fatigue (SMD = -0.59, 95% CI: -0.93 to -0.26, p = 0.0006).
  • Higher total response rate in intervention group (RR = 1.22, 95% CI: 1.07 to 1.40, p = 0.004).
  • No significant difference in adverse events between groups (RR = 2.26, 95% CI: 0.76 to 6.76, p = 0.144).
Interpretation:

Findings suggest acupuncture-related therapies may improve fatigue in CFS patients, but should be interpreted cautiously due to study limitations.

Limitations:
  • Limited number of studies and small sample sizes.
  • Moderate risk of bias in included studies.
  • High heterogeneity among studies.
Conclusion:

Current evidence indicates that acupuncture-related therapies may have some beneficial effects on fatigue in CFS patients; however, these findings should be interpreted cautiously due to study limitations, including small sample sizes and moderate risk of bias.

Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content