Monthly trends, determinants, and forecasting of perinatal mortality in Ghana: a comparison of ARIMA, BPNN, DLNN, and GRNN models - Summary - MDSpire

Monthly trends, determinants, and forecasting of perinatal mortality in Ghana: a comparison of ARIMA, BPNN, DLNN, and GRNN models

  • By

  • Agyei Helena Lartey

  • Denis Dekugmen Yar

  • Ama Asamaniwa Attua

  • Godfred Nyanney

  • Akuffo Samuel Tete Manukure

  • Isaac Takyi Boahen

  • Theophilus Oduro Kankam

  • Collins Mawuli Bakudie

  • July 10, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To analyze monthly patterns and influencing factors of perinatal mortality in Ghana and compare forecasting performance of ARIMA, BPNN, DLNN, and GRNN models.

Approach:
  • Study Design: Retrospective, hospital-based time series analysis of 192 monthly observations from January 2010 through December 2025.
  • Data Collection: Data included monthly statistics on live births, stillbirths, neonatal deaths, and antenatal care indicators.
  • Statistical Analysis: Stationarity assessed using Augmented Dickey Fuller test; forecasting performance compared across four models.
Key Findings:
  • Overall perinatal mortality rate (PMR) was 24.98 per 1,000 births, based on 46,108 live births and 1,152 perinatal deaths.
  • ARIMA model (3, 0, 0) showed the best out-of-sample accuracy with RMSE of 11.74.
  • Higher antenatal care (ANC) coverage associated with lower PMR; higher hypertension burden associated with higher PMR.
Interpretation:

Perinatal mortality has declined over the long term but remains unstable; ARIMA is the most accurate forecasting model among those evaluated.

Limitations:
  • Neural network model design lacked hyperparameter tuning and essential architectural details.
  • Comparative rigor between ARIMA and neural networks is limited due to modeling shortcomings and data constraints.
Conclusion:

Monthly PMR surveillance may assist in monitoring service quality and operational forecasting.

Original Source(s)

Related Content