Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more
Advertisement
Can Controlled Breathing Reduce Substance Craving?
A systematic review and meta-analysis found small, consistent reductions in craving across substance use disorders, while evidence for withdrawal symptoms and substance dependence remained limited.
To evaluate the effectiveness of controlled breathing interventions in reducing substance craving among patients with substance use disorders.
Approach:
Study Identification: Investigators searched eight databases through November 14, 2025, identifying 20 studies that met inclusion criteria.
Meta-Analysis: Fifteen studies were included in the meta-analysis, focusing on patients with alcohol, nicotine, opioid, stimulant, or polysubstance use disorders.
Intervention Types: Interventions included controlled breathing techniques such as heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB), resonant breathing, and yogic breathing.
Outcome Measures: Substance use-related outcomes examined included craving, withdrawal symptoms, and substance dependence.
Subgroup Analysis: A prespecified subgroup analysis compared HRVB with other breathing interventions.
Key Findings:
Controlled breathing was associated with a small reduction in craving compared to control conditions across 12 studies.
Heterogeneity was low, indicating consistent effects across studies.
Four studies on withdrawal symptoms showed no statistically significant benefit compared to controls.
Two randomized trials indicated significant pooled improvement in substance dependence, but based on few studies with substantial heterogeneity.
No significant difference was found between HRVB and other breathing interventions in reducing craving.
Interpretation:
The evidence was strongest for craving reduction, while evidence for withdrawal symptoms and substance dependence was less certain.
Limitations:
The analysis included quasi-experimental studies alongside randomized trials, leading to low certainty of evidence.
Small number of studies evaluating dependence and withdrawal.
Variability in intervention protocols and duration.
Lack of long-term follow-up in many studies.
Reliance on subjective outcome measures.
Conclusion:
Further high-quality randomized trials are needed to clarify the effects of controlled breathing on substance use-related outcomes.