Can Controlled Breathing Reduce Substance Craving? - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Can Controlled Breathing Reduce Substance Craving?

  • By

  • Andrea Surnit

  • August 10, 2026

  • 3 min

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the effectiveness of controlled breathing interventions in reducing substance craving among patients with substance use disorders.

Approach:
  • Study Identification: Investigators searched eight databases through November 14, 2025, identifying 20 studies that met inclusion criteria.
  • Meta-Analysis: Fifteen studies were included in the meta-analysis, focusing on patients with alcohol, nicotine, opioid, stimulant, or polysubstance use disorders.
  • Intervention Types: Interventions included controlled breathing techniques such as heart rate variability biofeedback (HRVB), resonant breathing, and yogic breathing.
  • Outcome Measures: Substance use-related outcomes examined included craving, withdrawal symptoms, and substance dependence.
  • Subgroup Analysis: A prespecified subgroup analysis compared HRVB with other breathing interventions.
Key Findings:
  • Controlled breathing was associated with a small reduction in craving compared to control conditions across 12 studies.
  • Heterogeneity was low, indicating consistent effects across studies.
  • Four studies on withdrawal symptoms showed no statistically significant benefit compared to controls.
  • Two randomized trials indicated significant pooled improvement in substance dependence, but based on few studies with substantial heterogeneity.
  • No significant difference was found between HRVB and other breathing interventions in reducing craving.
Interpretation:

The evidence was strongest for craving reduction, while evidence for withdrawal symptoms and substance dependence was less certain.

Limitations:
  • The analysis included quasi-experimental studies alongside randomized trials, leading to low certainty of evidence.
  • Small number of studies evaluating dependence and withdrawal.
  • Variability in intervention protocols and duration.
  • Lack of long-term follow-up in many studies.
  • Reliance on subjective outcome measures.
Conclusion:

Further high-quality randomized trials are needed to clarify the effects of controlled breathing on substance use-related outcomes.

Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content