Objective:

To compare conventional postoperative management with full-process intelligent information management in patients with indwelling double-J ureteral stents after surgery for urinary tract stones, focusing on delayed stent removal, catheter-related urinary tract infection, discharge teaching quality, social support, and patient satisfaction.

Approach:

• Method: label
• Method: text

Key Findings:

• The intervention group had a significantly lower rate of delayed double-J stent removal (0.00% vs. 10.00%, P = 0.048).
• The intervention group had a significantly lower rate of catheter-related urinary tract infection (0.00% vs. 12.00%, P = 0.023).
• The intervention group had a higher Quality of Discharge Teaching Scale score (145.32 ± 13.71 vs. 131.54 ± 12.57, P < 0.001).
• The intervention group had a higher Social Support Rating Scale score (45.68 ± 7.82 vs. 37.51 ± 7.89, P < 0.001).
• The intervention group had a higher overall patient satisfaction rate (96.00% vs. 82.00%, P = 0.025).

Interpretation:

Full-process intelligent information management improves postoperative management, reduces complications, and enhances patient education and satisfaction.

Limitations:

• The single-center nature of the study may limit the generalizability of the findings.
• The short follow-up duration may not capture long-term outcomes.

Conclusion:

Full-process intelligent information management can enhance postoperative care for patients with indwelling double-J stents.