Comparative effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions on depression and anxiety in aging populations: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials - Summary - MDSpire

Comparative effectiveness of non-pharmacological interventions on depression and anxiety in aging populations: a systematic review and network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • By

  • Peifeng Qin

  • Fangbo Li

  • Xuecheng Li

  • Xiaowei Feng

  • June 10, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To evaluate the comparative efficacy of non-pharmacological interventions for depression and anxiety in adults aged 55 years and older.

Approach:
    Key Findings:
    • Dance ranked highest for depression efficacy (SUCRA = 98.5%) and was superior to CBT, ICBT, waitlist, and usual care.
    • Resistance training (SUCRA = 67.5%) and CBT (SUCRA = 65.6%) followed in efficacy for depression.
    • For anxiety, music (SUCRA = 78.9%) and Tai Chi (SUCRA = 77.1%) ranked highest, with Tai Chi and CBT showing significant advantages over waitlist.
    • MBSR showed limited efficacy across both outcomes, while outdoor walking was among the least effective for depression.
    Interpretation:

    Dance and music/Tai Chi demonstrated the highest probabilities of efficacy for depression and anxiety, respectively, highlighting the need for a personalized, stepped-care approach due to study heterogeneity.

    Limitations:
    • Heterogeneity across studies may affect the interpretation of SUCRA rankings, potentially leading to misleading conclusions.
    • Limited effectiveness of MBSR and outdoor walking may not generalize across all populations.
    Conclusion:

    The study provides a nuanced framework for guiding personalized mental health care strategies in older adults, emphasizing the efficacy of specific non-pharmacological interventions.

    Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content