Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of tegileridine at different doses in patients with postoperative pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials - Summary - MDSpire

Evaluation of the efficacy and safety of tegileridine at different doses in patients with postoperative pain: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • By

  • Shanhui Yuan

  • Hui Ji

  • Yuntao Lu

  • Zhenyu Li

  • Junnan Wang

  • Hui Tang

  • July 3, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To comprehensively evaluate the efficacy and safety of tegileridine at different doses in patients with postoperative acute pain through a meta-analysis.

Approach:
  • Literature Search: Systematic literature search across six databases to identify randomized controlled trials involving tegileridine for postoperative acute pain.
  • Meta-Analysis: Meta-analyses performed using RevMan 5.4 software on data from included studies.
Key Findings:
  • Tegileridine significantly reduced rSPID24 and rSPID12 compared to placebo.
  • No significant difference in efficacy was observed between tegileridine and morphine at rSPID12, but tegileridine was significantly weaker than morphine at rSPID24.
  • Total adverse events with tegileridine were higher than placebo but comparable to morphine.
  • Incidence of nausea and vomiting with tegileridine was similar to placebo and significantly lower than morphine.
  • No significant difference in respiratory depression incidence between tegileridine and morphine.
Interpretation:

Tegileridine demonstrates significant efficacy over placebo and a more favorable safety profile than morphine regarding nausea and vomiting.

Limitations:
  • Limited number of studies included in the meta-analysis.
  • Potential biases in the included studies as assessed by the Cochrane Risk of Bias tool.
Conclusion:

Tegileridine may serve as a viable alternative for postoperative acute pain management.

Sources:

Original Source(s)

Related Content