Letter to Editor—Acetabular superior wall fractures: a distinct acetabular fracture entity - Summary - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Letter to the Editor: Superior Wall Fractures of the Acetabulum as a Distinct Fracture Type

  • By

  • Martin Salášek

  • Valér Džupa

  • November 11, 2026

Share

Objective:

To describe pediatric superior acetabular-region avulsions that the authors consider a possible counterpart to adult superior acetabular wall fractures.

Approach:
  • Study context: The authors refer to a 16-year multicenter analysis of pediatric pelvic-region avulsion fractures.
  • Diagnostic and treatment discussion: They summarize management and imaging considerations for reflected-head (RH) avulsions, distinguishing them from anterior inferior iliac spine (SIAI) avulsions.
Key Findings:
  • The analysis identified 9 avulsions in the superior acetabular region at the origin of the rectus femoris reflected head; 83 SIAI fractures had no acetabular extension.
  • All 9 RH avulsions were treated conservatively because displacement was no greater than 1 cm. Four occurred in football players, three in runners, and two in participants in other sports.
  • No complications, non-union, or post-traumatic femoroacetabular impingement occurred in this small series.
  • The authors report that combined pelvic-ring and superior acetabular-wall injuries are extremely uncommon in children; none occurred in their group.
Interpretation:

The authors propose that pediatric RH avulsions may represent a counterpart to “pure” superior acetabular wall fractures and emphasize that they differ in etiology from SIAI avulsions.

Limitations:
  • The RH-avulsion series included only 9 patients.
  • The letter reports no combined pelvic-ring and superior acetabular-wall injuries in the described group.
Conclusion:

The authors describe RH avulsions as a distinct pediatric injury pattern and discuss clinical assessment, radiography, and MRI; they state that MRI should be preferred to low-dose CT in pediatric patients.

Original Source(s)

Related Content