Treatment for intermediate and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: does systemic therapy synergize the therapeutic efficacy of TACE? - Summary - MDSpire

Treatment for intermediate and advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma: does systemic therapy synergize the therapeutic efficacy of TACE?

  • By

  • Zhuo Li

  • Jie Tan

  • Zhi-Jun Li

  • Peng Yan

  • Hua Xiang

  • May 1, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

Objective:

To investigate whether synchronized systemic therapy enhances the therapeutic efficacy of TACE in intermediate and advanced-stage HCC, particularly in terms of overall survival.

Key Findings:
  • No significant differences in baseline characteristics except for a higher proportion of Child-Pugh A patients in the combination group (90.2% vs. 67.3%, P=0.005).
  • Median PFS was similar between groups (5.5 vs. 6.0 months, P=0.832), with no significant differences in BCLC-B (18.3 vs. 17.4 months, P=0.516) or BCLC-C (4.1 vs. 3.7 months, P=0.255) subgroups.
  • Combination therapy showed a trend toward improved OS (24.8 vs. 16.7 months, P=0.282), significant in BCLC-C patients (17.9 vs. 11.0 months, P=0.048).
  • Grade 3 or 4 adverse events were comparable between groups (7.2% vs. 14.9%, P=0.187).
Interpretation:

Combining systemic therapy with TACE does not improve PFS but may enhance OS in BCLC-C patients, while maintaining a comparable safety profile.

Limitations:
  • Retrospective design may introduce bias and confounding factors.
  • Single-center study limits generalizability.
  • Small sample size in combination group may affect statistical power.
Conclusion:

Further prospective studies are warranted to optimize treatment strategies for HCC, particularly focusing on patient selection and the specific systemic therapies used.

Original Source(s)

Related Content