To evaluate the quality and reliability of kidney stone-related information on TikTok and Bilibili using validated assessment tools, including the Global Quality Score and modified DISCERN criteria.
Approach:
Key Findings:
Significant variations in content quality between platforms and types of content creators, with implications for public health.
Professional healthcare providers produced higher-quality content compared to non-medical creators.
Quality assessment tools like Global Quality Score and modified DISCERN criteria revealed disparities in information reliability.
Interpretation:
The study highlights the need for improved quality control of health information on social media, particularly for critical health topics like kidney stones, to protect public health.
Limitations:
Analysis limited to the top 100 videos, potentially missing relevant content that could influence findings.
Focus on Chinese-language videos may not represent global trends, limiting the applicability of results.
Conclusion:
Findings underscore the importance of enhancing kidney stone health education on social media platforms to ensure accurate and reliable information dissemination, which is crucial for public health.
