Efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound versus cryoablation for breast fibroadenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis - Takeaways - MDSpire

Efficacy and safety of high-intensity focused ultrasound versus cryoablation for breast fibroadenomas: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • By

  • YuanFeng Zhao

  • Jian Sun

  • Shuai Lin

  • May 1, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

  • 1

    High-intensity focused ultrasound (HIFU) achieved tumor volume reductions of 54.4% at 6 months and 70.3% at 12 months for breast fibroadenomas.

  • 2

    Cryoablation demonstrated greater tumor volume reduction compared to HIFU, although quantitative aggregation was not possible due to insufficient data.

  • 3

    Adverse event rates were 23% for HIFU and 7% for cryoablation, indicating a statistically significant difference in safety profiles.

  • 4

    Both HIFU and cryoablation are effective minimally invasive treatments for breast fibroadenomas, with cryoablation potentially offering better outcomes.

  • 5

    The study highlights the need for more high-quality comparative research to better inform clinical decisions regarding these treatment options.

Original Source(s)

Related Content