Discordance between pupillometry indices: a matter of scale and sedation - Takeaways - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Interpreting Disagreement Between Pupillometry Indices: Effects of Scale and Sedation

  • By

  • Pierre Bouzat

  • Antoine Vilotitch

  • Tobias Gauss

  • Fabio Silvio Taccone

  • October 27, 2026

Share

  • 1

    The QPi is recorded as an integer from 0 to 5, whereas the NPi is continuous from 0 to 4.9, amplifying discordance near the QPi abnormality cutoff of less than 3.

  • 2

    In brain-injured patients, median NPi was 4.3 and median QPi was 3; abnormal-value proportions were 1.2% for NPi and 12.7% for QPi.

  • 3

    In sedated patients without brain injury, sufentanil and propofol lowered QPi below 3 while NPi remained above 4, and low QPi was associated with resting pupil diameter below approximately 2.7 mm.

  • 4

    Sedation-related QPi reduction may be associated with poor outcomes through treatment burden, but the authors state that it should not be interpreted as evidence of neurological deterioration.

  • 5

    The authors recommend studying discordance with measurements of pupil diameter and sedation exposure, and conclude that abnormal QPi with normal NPi should prompt evaluation of these factors.

Original Source(s)

Related Content