Combined phacoemulsification and angle filtering procedures versus phacoemulsification with clinical outcomes in primary glaucoma coexisting with cataracts: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials - Takeaways - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Comparative Analysis of Combined Phacoemulsification and Angle Filtering Techniques Versus Phacoemulsification Alone in Patients with Primary Glaucoma and Cataracts: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials

  • By

  • Tangshou Xie

  • Wenrong Rao

  • Xi Liu

  • Yuanyi Li

  • Jie Zhu

  • June 8, 2026

Share

  • 1

    Combined phacoemulsification and angle filtering procedures significantly reduce intraocular pressure (IOP) compared to phacoemulsification alone.

  • 2

    Patients undergoing combined procedures require fewer anti-glaucoma medications (AGMs) than those receiving phacoemulsification alone.

  • 3

    The combined procedure has a smaller effect on best-corrected visual acuity (BCVA) than phacoemulsification alone without mitomycin C.

  • 4

    Combined phacoemulsification and angle filtering procedures are associated with a higher rate of complications compared to phacoemulsification alone.

  • 5

    Subgroup analysis indicates significant differences in BCVA for combined procedures without mitomycin C compared to phacoemulsification alone.

Original Source(s)

Related Content