Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention is not cost-effective - Takeaways - MDSpire

Negative pressure wound therapy for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention is not cost-effective

  • By

  • Pedro Saramago

  • Athanasios Gkekas

  • Catherine E Arundel

  • Ian C Chetter

  • the SWHSI-2 Trial Investigators

  • Belen Corbacho Martin

  • Catherine Hewitt

  • Andrew Mott

  • Samantha Swan

  • David Torgerson

  • Jacqueline Wilkinson

  • Sabeen Zahra

  • Jane Blazeby

  • Rhiannon Macefield

  • Stephen Dixon

  • Josie Hatfield

  • Angela Oswald

  • Jo Dumville

  • Matthew Lee

  • Thomas Pinkney

  • Nikki Stubbs

  • Lyn Wilson

  • May 6, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

  • 1

    Negative pressure wound therapy (NPWT) has limited evidence supporting its clinical effectiveness and cost-effectiveness for surgical wounds healing by secondary intention.

  • 2

    The study found NPWT associated with higher costs and marginally higher quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) compared to standard dressings.

  • 3

    The estimated probability of NPWT being cost-effective was less than 30%, indicating significant uncertainty in its economic viability.

  • 4

    No clear evidence was found that NPWT reduced healing time or complications compared to standard dressings in the SWHSI-2 trial.

  • 5

    The economic analysis utilized a Markov model to evaluate NPWT against standard dressings over a patient's lifetime from the UK healthcare perspective.

Original Source(s)

Related Content