Upfront surgery vs. neoadjuvant therapy in pancreatic cancer with venous involvement: a multicenter retrospective analysis - Takeaways - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Comparative Analysis of Initial Surgical Intervention versus Neoadjuvant Treatment in Pancreatic Cancer with Venous Involvement: A Multicenter Retrospective Study

  • By

  • Asif Halimi

  • Eline S. Zwart

  • Bengi S. Yilmaz

  • Benediktas Kurlinkus

  • Reea Ahola

  • Marco Del Chiaro

  • Ernesto Sparrelid

  • Elena Rangelova

  • Laura Maggino

  • Giuseppe Malleo

  • Gabriella Lionetto

  • Roberto Salvia

  • Keith J. Roberts

  • Francesco Giovinazzo

  • Massimo Falconi

  • Stefano Crippa

  • Giulio Belfiori

  • Geert Kazemier

  • Patrick Maisonneuve

  • Johanna Laukkarinen

  • Güralp O. Ceyhan

  • September 22, 2026

Share

  • 1

    Pancreatic cancer often presents with metastatic disease, with only 10-15% of cases suitable for primary resection.

  • 2

    The management of venous involvement in pancreatic cancer remains controversial, with differing guidelines on neoadjuvant therapy versus upfront surgery.

  • 3

    This study analyzed outcomes in 690 patients undergoing upfront surgery and 361 receiving neoadjuvant therapy before pancreatic resection.

  • 4

    Patients in the upfront surgery group had more advanced tumors and higher rates of complications compared to those receiving neoadjuvant therapy.

  • 5

    The study found that radical resection was achieved less frequently in the upfront surgery group, indicating potential differences in treatment outcomes.

Original Source(s)

Related Content