-
1
In EMERGE, the prespecified primary analysis found a risk difference of −6.9% (95% CI, −15.1% to 1.4%; P = .13) for metformin vs placebo.
-
2
A secondary generalized pairwise comparison analysis reported a win ratio of 1.46 (P = .004), but the authors characterize such reanalysis findings as exploratory or suggestive.
-
3
The primary analysis confidence interval was compatible with benefits ranging from substantial to minimal and indicated a low probability of harm on the composite outcome.
-
4
With uninformative priors, Bayesian analysis estimated a 95% probability that metformin reduced the primary composite and a 70% probability of a reduction exceeding 5 percentage points.
-
5
The authors state that EMERGE analyses favor metformin over harm, while the magnitude of benefit remains uncertain and requires further research.