PGT-A versus expectant management for fertile patients with recurrent pregnancy loss and prior aneuploidy: a dual-center, real-world study of 5-year cumulative pregnancy outcomes - Takeaways - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Comparative Analysis of PGT-A and Expectant Management in Fertile Individuals Experiencing Recurrent Pregnancy Loss and Previous Aneuploidy: A Five-Year Dual-Center Study on Cumulative Pregnancy Outcomes

  • By

  • Chunyan Wu

  • Ruochun Lian

  • Suhua Zou

  • Yan Xu

  • Yong Zeng

  • Qiong Wang

  • Lu Luo

  • August 27, 2026

Share

  • 1

    The study compared preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) and expectant management (EM) in fertile patients with recurrent pregnancy loss.

  • 2

    Among 216 patients, 145 underwent PGT-A and 71 chose EM, with primary outcomes focusing on live-birth achievement within 12 months.

  • 3

    Results showed lower conception leading to live birth rates within 12 months for PGT-A compared to EM (52.1% vs 81.7%; P < 0.001).

  • 4

    Five-year cumulative live birth rates were comparable between PGT-A and EM (94.4% vs 87.3%; P = 0.15), but PGT-A had a longer time to pregnancy.

  • 5

    Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios for PGT-A were ¥1,203,800 per additional live birth and ¥1,504,800 per miscarriage prevented.

Original Source(s)

Related Content