Identifying emergency department patients at risk of diagnostic discordance between the presumptive emergency department diagnosis and the adjudicated discharge diagnosis: The independent role of frailty - Takeaways - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Recognizing Emergency Department Patients Prone to Diagnostic Discrepancies Between Initial and Final Discharge Diagnoses: The Distinct Influence of Frailty

  • By

  • Yara M.W. van Knippenberg

  • Konstantin Föhse

  • Charlotte C.M. Schaap

  • Mihai G. Netea

  • Jacobien Hoogerwerf

  • Jaap ten Oever

  • August 15, 2026

Share

  • 1

    Diagnostic discordance between presumptive ED diagnoses and adjudicated discharge diagnoses has been reported in 8% to 43% of patients with suspected infection.

  • 2

    Frailty, reflecting reduced physiological reserve, was independently associated with diagnostic discordance in ED patients with suspected infection.

  • 3

    Frailty and higher age-adjusted comorbidity burden were independently associated with diagnostic discordance, whereas age alone was not independently associated after adjustment.

  • 4

    The analysis included 646 unique adults presenting to the ED with suspected infection after duplicate presentations were excluded.

  • 5

    Diagnostic discordance was defined as disagreement in either the presence or focus of infection between the presumptive ED diagnosis and the adjudicated discharge diagnosis.

Original Source(s)

Related Content