Diagnostic accuracy of modern imaging following neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: a comparative analysis of ultrasound versus [18F] FDG PET/MRI in breast response assessment - Takeaways - MDSpire

Diagnostic accuracy of modern imaging following neoadjuvant therapy for breast cancer: a comparative analysis of ultrasound versus [18F] FDG PET/MRI in breast response assessment

  • By

  • Rosa Di Micco

  • Selin Saracoglu

  • André Pfob

  • Carla Canevari

  • Francesca Gallivanone

  • Lidija Antunovic

  • Fabrizia Gelardi

  • Paola Scifo

  • Ilaria Neri

  • Claudio Losio

  • Elena Venturini

  • Giovanna Della Vecchia

  • Goffredo Ferrarese

  • Nicole Rotmensz

  • Veronica Zuber

  • Sara Baleri

  • Giovanni Cisternino

  • Silvia Paola Corona

  • Francesca Calabretto

  • Mario Rampa

  • Luca Licata

  • Giulia Viale

  • Stefania Zambelli

  • Isabella Sassi

  • Giampaolo Bianchini

  • Pietro Panizza

  • Arturo Chiti

  • Joerg Heil

  • Oreste Davide Gentilini

  • June 18, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

  • 1

    This study compares ultrasound and [18F]FDG PET/MRI for predicting pathological complete response in breast cancer after primary systemic therapy.

  • 2

    The analysis included 143 patients, with 54 from a prospective trial and 89 from a retrospective database.

  • 3

    [18F]FDG PET/MRI had a sensitivity of 62% and specificity of 67%, while ultrasound had a sensitivity of 59% and specificity of 62%.

  • 4

    No significant differences were found between [18F]FDG PET/MRI and ultrasound in sensitivity or specificity for detecting response to treatment.

  • 5

    Subgroup analysis indicated varying sensitivity levels for both imaging modalities across different tumor molecular subtypes.

Original Source(s)

Related Content