Real-world treatment patterns and clinical outcomes in relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma across Asia: a multicenter Asian Myeloma Network study (AMN010) - Takeaways - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Treatment Approaches and Clinical Outcomes for Relapsed/Refractory Multiple Myeloma in Asia: A Multicenter Asian Myeloma Network Study (AMN010)

  • By

  • Melinda SY Tan

  • Kye Ling Wong

  • Cinnie Soekojo

  • Chandramouli Nagarajan

  • Sarah Burkhill

  • Xinhua Li

  • Ho-Jin Shin

  • Jong Heon Jung

  • Yeung-Chul Mun

  • Ho-Young Yhim

  • Jae Hoon Lee

  • Ling Cao

  • Tadao Ishida

  • Chihiro Shimazaki

  • Makoto Sasaki

  • Hiroyuki Takamatsu

  • Shinsuke Iida

  • Hirono Iriuchishima

  • Shuji Ozaki

  • Karen Tang

  • Jeffrey Huang

  • Jerry Teng

  • Cheng-Shyong Chang

  • Changki Min

  • Wenming Chen

  • Hiroshi Handa

  • Kihyun Kim

  • Priti Bahety

  • Juan Du

  • Wee Joo Chng

  • November 11, 2026

Share

  • 1

    This retrospective study included 1,123 patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma treated across six Asian countries and regions during 2020–2022.

  • 2

    Treatment patterns varied widely, with 75 regimens in second line, 79 in third line, and 52 in fourth line; triplets predominated, while monotherapy was most common in fourth line.

  • 3

    Outcomes worsened with successive treatment lines: median progression-free survival declined from 16.1 months in second line to 9.1 months in third line and 5.2 months in fourth line.

  • 4

    Overall response rates decreased from 71.6% in second line to 58.9% in third line and 43.6% in fourth line.

  • 5

    Greater drug-class refractoriness was associated with poorer outcomes, and triple-class refractory patients had the shortest median progression-free survival across treatment lines.

Original Source(s)

Related Content