Clarifying statistical comparisons and procedural change in the TAPP learning curve - Takeaways - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Interpreting Statistical Comparisons and Procedural Changes During the TAPP Learning Curve

  • By

  • Tuğberk Tok

  • Ahmet Furkan Mazlum

  • October 9, 2026

Share

  • 1

    The study reported postoperative complications of 8/42, 4/42, and 2/42 across three phases, with a reported P value of .048.

  • 2

    Reconstructed Pearson tests from published counts yielded P = .105 for complications and P = .110 for mesh fixation, rather than the reported P = .048.

  • 3

    A two-sided Fisher–Freeman–Halton exact test for complications yielded P = .135, while a linear-by-linear trend test yielded P = .038.

  • 4

    Operative time decreased from 88 to 58 minutes as mesh fixation declined from 42.9% to 21.4%, so reduced fixation may have contributed to shorter procedures.

  • 5

    The correspondence does not dispute the decrease in operative time or the temporal complication pattern and seeks clarification of statistical comparisons not reproducible from published aggregate dat

Original Source(s)

Related Content