Anatomical and functional outcomes of combined ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpo/hysteropexy for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis - Takeaways - MDSpire

Anatomical and functional outcomes of combined ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpo/hysteropexy for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • By

  • Alessandro Ferdinando Ruffolo

  • Tomaso Melocchi

  • Chrystèle Rubod

  • Yohan Kerbage

  • Giuseppe Campagna

  • Sara Mastrovito

  • Alfredo Ercoli

  • Giovanni Panico

  • Michel Cosson

  • Marine Lallemant

  • December 8, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

  • 1

    Pelvic organ prolapse affects approximately 24% of women, increasing with age and often requiring surgical intervention.

  • 2

    Combined ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpopexy improves anatomical and functional outcomes for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse.

  • 3

    Laparoscopic ventral mesh rectopexy minimizes dissection and allows safe simultaneous performance with sacrocolpopexy.

  • 4

    This systematic review adheres to PRISMA 2020 guidelines and aims to synthesize evidence on combined surgical approaches.

  • 5

    The study evaluates outcomes such as postoperative complications, recurrence rates, and symptom improvement after surgery.

Original Source(s)

Anatomical and functional outcomes of combined ventral rectopexy and sacrocolpo/hysteropexy for multicompartment pelvic organ prolapse: a systematic review and meta-analysis

  • by Alessandro Ferdinando Ruffolo, Tomaso Melocchi, Chrystèle Rubod, Yohan Kerbage, Giuseppe Campagna, Sara Mastrovito, Alfredo Ercoli, Giovanni Panico, Michel Cosson, Marine Lallemant

  • December 8, 2025

Related Content

Associations between adjuvant antibiotic therapy and fistula formation after incision and drainage of anorectal abscesses: results from a retrospective cohort study

Semiflex-assisted vacuum therapy for perianal fistulas: the Semiflex pilot study

Long-Term Outcomes of One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: A Systematic Review of Studies with at Least 10 Years of Follow-Up