Uterine-Sparing vNOTES vs. laparoscopic lateral suspension for pelvic organ prolapse repair: a prospective comparative study of feasibility and early outcomes - Takeaways - MDSpire

Uterine-Sparing vNOTES vs. laparoscopic lateral suspension for pelvic organ prolapse repair: a prospective comparative study of feasibility and early outcomes

  • By

  • Abdurrahman Sengi

  • Mehmet Nuri Duran

  • Mayıs Jinda Pekgül

  • Nurullah Peker

  • May 8, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

  • 1

    The study compared vNOTES and laparoscopic lateral suspension for pelvic organ prolapse repair in 100 women.

  • 2

    vNOTES demonstrated significantly shorter operative times and hospital stays compared to laparoscopic lateral suspension.

  • 3

    At 6 months, vNOTES showed superior POP-Q measurements for Ba and Bp, indicating better anatomical correction.

  • 4

    Functional outcomes favored vNOTES with lower scores on POPDI-6 and UDI-6 at both follow-ups.

  • 5

    Both techniques were safe with low complication rates, but vNOTES offered faster recovery and improved functional symptoms.

Original Source(s)

Uterine-Sparing vNOTES vs. laparoscopic lateral suspension for pelvic organ prolapse repair: a prospective comparative study of feasibility and early outcomes

  • by Abdurrahman Sengi, Mehmet Nuri Duran, Mayıs Jinda Pekgül, Nurullah Peker

  • May 8, 2026

Related Content

Collaborative Team Strategies in Surgical Management of Placenta Accreta: Issues and Insights

Can we make it up? - second-look surgery due to post-operative residual tumour in patients diagnosed with diffuse glioma

Comparative Analysis of Vaginal Natural Orifice Transluminal Endoscopic Surgery and Laparoscopy for Ovarian Cystectomy: Results from a Prospective, Open-Label, Randomized Non-Inferiority Pilot Study