Clinical efficacy analysis of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) in the treatment of rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective analysis - Takeaways - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Comparative Study of Natural Orifice Specimen Extraction Surgery (NOSES) Versus Conventional Laparoscopic Surgery (CLS) for Rectal Cancer Treatment: A Retrospective Analysis from a Single Center

  • By

  • Kai Deng

  • Yi-ran Li

  • Teng-long Guo

  • Jun-zhe Dou

  • Yu-liang Cui

  • Ying-feng Su

  • July 13, 2025

Share

  • 1

    Colorectal cancer is the third most common cancer globally, necessitating effective surgical treatments to improve patient outcomes.

  • 2

    Natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) offers a minimally invasive option for rectal cancer, potentially reducing postoperative pain and complications.

  • 3

    This study analyzed 221 rectal cancer patients, comparing outcomes between NOSES (24 patients) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS, 197 patients).

  • 4

    Key treatment indicators evaluated included surgical time, blood loss, VAS scores, hospital stay, and complications to assess the efficacy of each surgical approach.

  • 5

    The study's findings aim to provide an evidence-based foundation for selecting surgical approaches in rectal cancer treatment.

Original Source(s)

Clinical efficacy analysis of natural orifice specimen extraction surgery (NOSES) and conventional laparoscopic surgery (CLS) in the treatment of rectal cancer: a single-center retrospective analysis

  • by Kai Deng, Yi-ran Li, Teng-long Guo, Jun-zhe Dou, Yu-liang Cui, Ying-feng Su

  • July 13, 2025

Related Content

Error in Figure 1

  • October 5, 2026

Parental perspectives on gluten immunogenic peptide urine testing in children with coeliac disease: a qualitative study on barriers, emotions and interest in point-of-care tools

Initial non-surgical versus upfront surgical management of ERCP-related perforations by Stapfer type: a systematic review and meta-analysis