Prognostic impact of need for re-induction based on day-14 residual disease and age-adapted consolidation strategy in acute myeloid leukemia - Takeaways - MDSpire
Coming Soon: Introducing MDSpire News. Learn more
Conexiant’s news site is now MDSpire News. Learn more

Prognostic Significance of Re-Induction Necessity Based on Day-14 Residual Disease and Age-Adjusted Consolidation Approaches in Acute Myeloid Leukemia

  • By

  • Abiola Bolarinwa

  • Muhammad Yousuf

  • Aref Al-Kali

  • Hassan B. Alkhateeb

  • Abhishek A. Mangaonkar

  • Antoine N. Saliba

  • Mehrdad Hefazi Torghabeh

  • Aasiya Matin

  • Michelle A. Elliott

  • Mark R. Litzow

  • William J. Hogan

  • Mithun V. Shah

  • Mrinal M. Patnaik

  • Animesh Pardanani

  • Dong Chen

  • Kaaren K. Reichard

  • Rong He

  • Naseema Gangat

  • Ayalew Tefferi

  • Kebede H. Begna

  • September 30, 2026

Share

  • 1

    Induction treatment for AML aims for complete remission, with re-induction recommended if residual disease exceeds 5% blasts on day 14.

  • 2

    The study evaluated 279 AML patients, finding that re-induction was necessary for 27% due to residual disease or persistent extramedullary disease.

  • 3

    Multivariable analysis indicated that age ≥65 years, post-CMN status, adverse karyotype, and re-induction requirement independently predicted relapse.

  • 4

    Overall survival was significantly lower for patients requiring re-induction, with median OS of 37 months compared to 106 months for those who did not.

  • 5

    Consolidation regimens showed varied outcomes, with IDAC yielding longer RFS and OS in older patients compared to anthracycline-based regimens.

Original Source(s)

Related Content