Randomized prospective trial comparing ejaculatory preservation HoLEP versus standard HoLEP: the other face of the coin - Takeaways - MDSpire

Randomized prospective trial comparing ejaculatory preservation HoLEP versus standard HoLEP: the other face of the coin

  • By

  • Ahmed Eliwa

  • Ali Aldarraji

  • Khaled Abdelwahab

  • Emad Salem

  • March 3, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

  • 1

    The study compares Ejaculatory Preservation HoLEP with standard HoLEP, focusing on early postoperative continence and antegrade ejaculation outcomes.

  • 2

    Forty-three patients with benign prostatic hyperplasia were randomized to receive either standard HoLEP or Ejaculatory Preservation HoLEP.

  • 3

    Primary endpoints included early postoperative continence assessed at 1 and 3 months using the ICIQ-UI SF questionnaire.

  • 4

    Secondary endpoints evaluated changes in ejaculatory function and urinary symptoms using MSHQ-EjD-SF and IPSS scores.

  • 5

    The study aims to address the prevalence of retrograde ejaculation and urinary incontinence following HoLEP procedures.

Original Source(s)

Randomized prospective trial comparing ejaculatory preservation HoLEP versus standard HoLEP: the other face of the coin

  • by Ahmed Eliwa, Ali Aldarraji, Khaled Abdelwahab, Emad Salem

  • March 3, 2025

Related Content

Posterior urethroplasty for pelvic fracture urethral injuries: risk factors for recurrence and complications

The percentage abundance of sarcomatoid component has a prognostic role in grade 4 non-metastatic clear cell-renal carcinoma

Real-world comparison of Rezūm® water vapor therapy and transurethral resection of the prostate using a pragmatic composite definition of procedural success