Financial implications of single-use versus multi-use instruments in minimally invasive surgical procedures: a comprehensive review - Takeaways - MDSpire

Financial implications of single-use versus multi-use instruments in minimally invasive surgical procedures: a comprehensive review

  • By

  • Pieter J. W. Greve

  • Masie Rahimi

  • Freek Daams

  • Jan Willem M. Greve

  • Jaap H. Bonjer

  • Tim Horeman

  • Marlies P. Schijven

  • April 22, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

  • 1

    Minimally invasive surgeries reduce recovery times and complications compared to traditional surgeries, highlighting their importance in modern medicine.

  • 2

    Disposable instruments have higher per-unit costs but lower risks of cross-contamination, while reusable instruments can be more cost-effective over time.

  • 3

    The environmental impact of surgical instruments is complex, with disposables contributing to waste and reusables requiring resources for cleaning and sterilization.

  • 4

    There is a lack of comprehensive studies comparing the economic and environmental impacts of disposable versus reusable instruments in surgical settings.

  • 5

    This systematic review aims to synthesize existing evidence on the cost-effectiveness and environmental implications of surgical instruments in minimally invasive procedures.

Original Source(s)

Financial implications of single-use versus multi-use instruments in minimally invasive surgical procedures: a comprehensive review

  • by Pieter J. W. Greve, Masie Rahimi, Freek Daams, Jan Willem M. Greve, Jaap H. Bonjer, Tim Horeman, Marlies P. Schijven

  • April 22, 2026

Related Content

Lactate–Albumin Ratio Tied to TBI Mortality

Admission biomarker showed prognostic value alongside clinical scoring systems in pediatric intensive care

Layered precision suturing vs. traditional double-layer closure at cesarean: a randomized trial of uterine scar healing and maternal outcomes

Repair of partial atrioventricular septal defect through a modified right vertical infra-axillary thoracotomy: a single-center experience