Should thalamic recording be standard practice or institutional review board-approved research in stereoEEG? - Takeaways - MDSpire

Should thalamic recording be standard practice or institutional review board-approved research in stereoEEG?

  • By

  • Brian Litt

  • William K S Ojemann

  • Odile Feys

  • Sameer Sheth

  • February 7, 2026

  • 0 min

Share

  • 1

    Thalamic implantation in stereoEEG is debated as either a standard practice or a research activity requiring IRB approval.

  • 2

    Proponents argue thalamic SEEG enhances patient care, while critics demand evidence from randomized trials to support its efficacy.

  • 3

    Ethical considerations are central to the discussion, balancing patient safety against the potential benefits of thalamic recordings.

  • 4

    Variability in expertise and protocols across institutions complicates the interpretation of thalamic SEEG results.

  • 5

    The debate reflects broader challenges in medical practice regarding the adoption of procedures without class I evidence.

Original Source(s)

Should thalamic recording be standard practice or institutional review board-approved research in stereoEEG?

  • by Brian Litt, William K S Ojemann, Odile Feys, Sameer Sheth

  • February 7, 2026

Related Content

Electroencephalographic abnormalities and clinical phenotypes in children with autism spectrum disorder: a single center cohort study

Application Value of Resting-State fMRI in Preoperative Lateralization of Language Areas in Epilepsy with Left-Sided Epileptogenic Foci

Polymorphous low-grade neuroepithelial tumor of the young: a case report