Which current chatbot is more competent in urological theoretical knowledge? A comparative analysis by the European board of urology in-service assessment - Takeaways - MDSpire

Which current chatbot is more competent in urological theoretical knowledge? A comparative analysis by the European board of urology in-service assessment

  • By

  • Mehmet Fatih Şahin

  • Çağrı Doğan

  • Erdem Can Topkaç

  • Serkan Şeramet

  • Furkan Batuhan Tuncer

  • Cenk Murat Yazıcı

  • February 11, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

  • 1

    This study evaluated the performance of five chatbots on the European Board of Urology In-Service Assessment questions.

  • 2

    Copilot Pro achieved the highest overall success rate of 71.6%, excelling particularly in transplantation/nephrology.

  • 3

    GPT-4o had a success rate of 65.8%, with strengths in lithiasis/infections but weaknesses in trauma/emergency.

  • 4

    Gemini Advanced scored 68.5%, performing best in miscellaneous topics but showing moderate success in trauma/emergency.

  • 5

    The research highlights the potential of chatbots in urology education, emphasizing their ability to synthesize and interpret medical knowledge.

Original Source(s)

Which current chatbot is more competent in urological theoretical knowledge? A comparative analysis by the European board of urology in-service assessment

  • by Mehmet Fatih Şahin, Çağrı Doğan, Erdem Can Topkaç, Serkan Şeramet, Furkan Batuhan Tuncer, Cenk Murat Yazıcı

  • February 11, 2025

Related Content

Steady-state versus burst lasing techniques for thulium fiber laser

Experience of 5 years adjustable continence therapy (ProACT): the surgical learning curve and patient outcomes

Modified amplatz sheath with suction versus standard sheath in percutaneous nephrolithotomy for treating large renal stones > 2 cm: a prospective randomized trial