Modified Smead–Jones suture for closure of emergency midline laparotomy incision: systematic review and meta-analysis - Takeaways - MDSpire

Modified Smead–Jones suture for closure of emergency midline laparotomy incision: systematic review and meta-analysis

  • By

  • Mahmoud Diaa Hindawi

  • Ruaa Mustafa Qafesha

  • Ahmed Hamdy G. Ali

  • Hazim Alkousheh

  • Hatem Eldeeb

  • Haitham Salem

  • Abd-Elfattah Kalmoush

  • Amr Elrosasy

  • April 29, 2025

  • 0 min

Share

  • 1

    Midline laparotomy is commonly used in emergency surgeries but carries risks of incisional hernia, wound dehiscence, and infections.

  • 2

    The Modified Smead–Jones suture (MSJ) technique utilizes a continuous suture method to improve closure outcomes compared to traditional methods.

  • 3

    This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy of MSJ and Smead–Jones sutures against continuous sutures in emergency settings.

  • 4

    MSJ significantly reduced wound dehiscence and infection rates compared to Smead–Jones sutures, indicating its potential benefits in surgical practice.

  • 5

    No significant differences were found in the risk of incisional hernia between MSJ and Smead–Jones sutures, highlighting a need for further research.

Original Source(s)

Related Content